Home

Buch-Shop  

Ausstellungen

Genetik

Archiv

Literatur

 Links

Impressum

 

 

Book-Shop

Shows

Genetics

Archive

Literature

 

  Datenschutz

 

The History of the Ancient Messenger Pigeon: A picture is worth a thousand words

Lifelike images from the past often convey far more than a thousand words. Sometimes, they even refute accounts written by later observers. Common perceptions are frequently shaped by flights of fancy and gaps in knowledge filled by speculation—misconceptions that persist to this day. This holds true for the history of the ancient messenger pigeon as well, despite corrections subsequently offered by critical authors.

The "Carrier" pigeon of the Ottoman Empire, described by Willughby in 1678, could be seen in London—notably in the royal flight aviaries (p. 181). It likely arrived there from Scanderoon in Asia Minor. The Royal Navy visited this port every few years due to the presence of an English merchant settlement in Aleppo, located about 100 km inland. The merchants regularly used messenger pigeons to receive news of arriving ships (as recorded by Henry Teonge in his diary from 1675–1679).

Source: Willughby 1678

According to Willughby’s description, the Carrier was the size of an ordinary pigeon, or slightly smaller; its coloration is dark blue or blackish, and the eye is surrounded by bare, knobby, white, fleshy skin. The beak is black—not short, but of moderate length. Halfway from the head the upper chap of the bill is covered with a double crust of white naked fungous skin, of the same type as the broad circle encompassing the eyes. The size shown in the illustration resemble those of the adjacent Barbary Pigeon; they are visible but far less pronounced than those of the Carrier described by Moore in 1735 and depicted

in the ‘Treatise’ of 1765.

Throughout his life, the bibliographer Werner K.G. Moebes (1899–1983) grappled with the question of the relationships between the English Carrier, the Dragoon, and the Horseman—breeds that Moore, as the author of the first monograph on domestic pigeons, linked to messenger pigeons in his 1735 text. Moebes’s efforts proved fruitless, partly because Moore had interpreted Willughby’s accounts idiosyncratically and laid false trails.

He attributed the legend of the ancient messenger pigeon to the pigeon—already bred within his circle of friends for size, beak length, and extreme wattling.

For Willughby, "Horseman" was synonymous with "Carrier," as the "Light Horseman" (an allusion to light cavalry) is described as a cross between a Carrier and a Pouter. Moore, by contrast, portrays the Horseman as a version of the Carrier in which all the Carrier’s characteristic traits are less pronounced. He notes that the "true" Carrier was simply too valuable in his day to risk their being lost (p. 32)—hence the use of the Horseman as a messenger pigeon in England. He questions whether the Horseman constitutes a distinct breed, even though he was aware of imports of such pigeons from Scanderoon and knew of their capabilities. He stops himself from dwelling on the matter further, deeming it not his place to answer such weighty questions (Moore 1735, p. 31).

Even early dissenting voices in the literature failed to shake the myth—originated by Moore—that the English Exhibition Carrier was an ancient messenger pigeon. Had Selby (1835), Tegetmeier (1868), and Fulton (1876) possessed the images of Dragoons, Horsemans, and Carriers from the period shortly after Moore—images now accessible thanks to the digitization of library collections—to substantiate their doubts, they might have received a more attentive hearing. As it stands, early fanciful notions continue to shape the perceptions of many pigeon enthusiasts to this day.

Based on the depictions of the Dragoon and Horseman by Peter Paillou (1744/45) and the English Carrier by Ch. Collins (1741), the former appear to be distinct strains of the Arabian messenger pigeon. The English Carrier, by contrast, is the product of selective breeding for wattle development and crossing with upright, long-beaked Bagdettes. Brent (1871) had already surmised as much. A drawing by Peter Paillou from 1745, included here, also points to this conclusion; while the original is labeled "Bagdad" on the reverse, it is archived in the collection as a "Horseman"—apparently because it did not align with the archivist's understanding.

Source: Axel Sell/Jana Sell, Genetics of the Domestic Pigeon, Achim 2025, p. 174

 

Literature

Anonymous, A Treatise on Domestic Pigeons, London MDCCLXV (1765), Reprint Chicheley, Bucking­hamshire 1972.

Brent, B.P., The Pigeon Book, 3. ed., London (1871)

Fulton, R., The Illustrated Book of Pigeons. London, Paris, New York and Melbourne 1876.

McGill Library Archival Collections, Taylor White Collection

Moebes, Werner K.G., Bibliographie der Tauben, Akademischer Verlag Halle 1945

Moore, J., Pigeon-House. Being an Introduction to Natural History of Tame Pigeons. Colum­barium: or the pigeon house, Printed for J. Wilford, London 1735.

Selby, P.J., The Naturalist’s Library, edited by Sir W. Jardine, Bart., Vol. XIX. Ornithology. Pi­geons, Edinburgh 1835

Sell, Axel, Jana Sell, Genetics of the Domestic Pigeon, Achim 2025

Tegetmeier, W.B., Pigeons: their structure, varieties, habits and management, London 1868.

Teonge, Henry; The Diary of Henry Teonge. Chaplain on Board H.M.‘s Ships Assistance, Bristol, and Royal Oak, 1675-1679, edited by Sir E. Denison Ross and Eileen Power in the Broadway Travellers. First published in this Series 1927

Willughby, F., Ornithologia, compiled and edited posthumously by John Ray, London 1678